Summary and Critical Reflection of a Talk Essay

Summary and Critical Reflection of a Talk - Essay ExampleThis makes the people supporting convicted mothers right to have it off with their children in prison raise questions about equality rights and if the government and law re anyy c bes about the inseparable rights of guilty women at all. The desire to keep a child close to look after him/her is a natural right of a parent regardless of his/her criminal background. This approach forms the bedrock of the female lawyer in the audio link who interestingly contemplates the validity of rights of imprisoned women to keep their children close. She establishes herself as an enthusiastic supporter of imprisoned womens rights believing many of them are really confronted with doomed challenges. The lawyer who is also a shrewd womens rights activist calmly asks that in absence of a good rehabilitation program, where is an unfortunate child supposed to go? The presence of a father or a guardian is one option, just what happens to a large population of children who in the absence of a thoughtful child protection group have nowhere to go when not allowed by the state to stay with their unfortunate mothers? It is worried by her that in many instances, a mother despite her felonious record is fit to handle the chores of a regular mother but she is hush up denied the right to hold custody of her child. This rejection is only made emphatic by the fact that she is incarcerated, has committed some crime in the past, violated the law, and lost all reputation. However, it should be pondered here by opponents of children inside prison ideology as suggested by the lawyer that does any of these factors really make the desire of an imprisoned char to live with her children any less overwhelming? Does the ministrys decision to take children away from their guilty mother to help them grow up in a nontoxic atmosphere also snatch this will of the mother to see her children on routine basis? Such concerns are open to multiple interp retations as claimed by the lawyer and implementing decision based on analysis of only one side of the picture is not a smart talent strategy. When at that place is not enough evidence suggesting a mother is physically, mentally, or behaviorally capable of looking after her child, creating barriers between mother and child is empty mockery of natural human rights. It is claimed by the highly concerned lawyer speaking for all incarcerated mothers that the importance of creating more mother and baby units in jails where cannot be stressed enough. It should be safely assumed by governments everywhere that the best place of all for a child to stay is with his/her parent provided the parent is not disadvantaged mentally. The gist of imprisoned womens rights picked up momentum and made headlines in Vancouver, Canada when the provincial program got cancelled in 2008 which allowed babies to stay with their mothers. It is claimed in one report that this disallow step taken by the law enfo rcement agencies and state not only negatively interfered with the infants right to a mothers care, but also raised valid questions about discrimination against female prisoners and inequality of rights. It is compellingly stated by Peter Hough that the lives of far more people in straightaways world are imperiled by human rights abuses than by terrorist or conventional military attacks (cited in Darian-Smith, 2013, p. 257). The report further reveals the