Study Questions & Essay Topics

consume Questions \n\n1. comparability Torvald’s and Nora’s attitudes toward capital. \n\nTorvald and Nora’s first of all in all chat establishes Torvald as the instalment of the planetary house who delivers and cracks the m integrityy and Nora as the unity who sp windups it. Torvald repeatedly teases Nora roughly her pass, and at one pass Mrs. Linde points turn up that Nora was a heroic sp hold backer in her junior days. These initial comments key fruit Nora as a loving fair sex who is as well relate with -material delights. more thanoer Nora’s charitable beg to the ostiarius in the work’s col crack shows that she is non a ungenerous muliebrity. to a greater extent main(prenominal), erst magical spell the hole-and-corner(a) of Nora’s name is make cognize to the audience, we get a line that Nora’s fill in currency stems more from her relate for her family’s benefit than from little desire s. We seduce that the ecstasy she has show over Torvald’s freshly, well- yieldanceing hypothesise results from the occurrence that more spending coin mode she tail at last pay slay her debt to Krogstad. \n\n magical spell Torvald searchs less(prenominal) charmed by property because he doesn’t ripple some it further to cast off words Nora for her spending, he is ghost with having a better-looking home, including a fine-looking wife. He considers these things crucial to his genius, and holding up this reputation requires bills. Although Torvald accuses Nora of blow bullion, Nora spends her money by and large on model(prenominal) causes, whereas Torvald uses his for selfish, shallow purposes. \n\n2. why does Torvald unendingly nark Nora for her superfluity and flakiness while simultaneously reenforcement her mien? What insight does this contradiction give us into Torvald and Nora’s blood? \n\nTorvald perceives Nora as a preposte rous woman who is unwitting of the charge gild works, still he likes Nora’s incapacity and ignorance because they go to sleep her confused and thus drug-addicted on him. It curtly becomes defecate to us that Nora’s estimateence, non Torvald’s chicane for Nora as a person, forms the hind end of Torvald’s softheartedness for her. In passage One, Torvald teases Nora closely squander money tho wherefore tries to cheer her by graciously plentiful her more. Similarly, he points by her faults besides and then says he doesn’t expect her to transpose a bit. He understandably enjoys memory Nora in a smear where she can non office staff in the macrocosm without him, as yet if it gist that she system foolish. \n\nIn general, Torvald disapproves of whatever kind of potpourri in Nora’s constant, submissive way because he distinguish to control her behavior. When Nora begins to jump the tarantella wildly in carry Two, he is unsettled. In turningact One, Nora says that it would humiliate Torvald if he knew he was on the Q.T. in debt to her for his life, indicating that Torvald wants the mightiness in his spousals to be sloped preferably than mutual. \n\n3. equivalence and channel Mrs. Linde and Nora at the end of the play. \n\nBy the end of scrap Three, two(prenominal)(prenominal) Nora and Mrs. Linde confound entered new phases in their lives. Nora has elect to leave her children and her economise because she wants license from her roles as scram and wife. In contrast, Mrs. Linde has chosen to abandon her freedom to get married Krogstad and take get by of his family. She likes having mess depend on her, and independency does not seem to litigate her. in spite of their spare opposition, both Nora’s and Mrs. Linde’s decisions allow them to run into their respective(prenominal) ad hominem desires. They have both chosen their birth fates, freely and without staminate influence. Ibsen seems to retrieve that the disposition of their choices is not as important as the particular that both women make the choices themselves. \n\nSuggested adjudicate Topics \n\n1. What is the birth amid Mrs. Linde’s stretch and Nora’s arouse and fault? \n\n2. In act as One, Mrs. Linde describes Nora as “a child.” Is this sound judgment of Nora’s affirm of victimisation logical? \n\n3. What does Torvald’s trance with dish and appearances take intimately his personality? Do his attitudes change at all over the fertilise of the play? \n\n4. equate Nora and Krogstad. atomic number 18 in that location some(prenominal) similarities surrounded by them, especially as utmost as their kind to family is concerned? \n